Heebocrisy II: Tall TikTok Tales

Greenwald defines another social media giant's censorship in a manner that works for him and his - thanks again, Matt...

On Glenn Greenwald’s Tuesday podcast, right after his seminar on free speech that I covered on my last piece, he dug back into TikTok, I guess because Nimarata continues to label it Chinese propaganda.

Woah, Glenn, the United States Data Security division is part of the US government??

USDS / TikTok is a page on the TikTok website that includes a timeline on their USDS that starts with the launch of Project Texas with Oracle:

https://usds.tiktok.com/

Why Oracle? I touched on that in my piece Lost in America: the Clock is TikToking a week ago:

Huh, I thought this was a Chinese company. I can’t get into the Times article because of their paywall, but the bit visible on my search says, “It was led by Adam Presser, TikTok's head of operations, and Seth Melnick, its global head of user operations... Mr. Presser and Mr. Melnick of TikTok, who are also Jewish…“

When I looked into this further I found that surely the key player in all this at TikTok is VP Michael Beckerman, Head of US Public Policy. And, yes, he is a Jew as well. After more digging I found out that US TikTok apparently has significant autonomy from its Chinese parent company, and that this was in part the result of a large minority interest being sold to US companies in early 2021, principally Oracle. Oracle as in Larry Ellison’s Oracle; you can see Larry in the below image, GOP side, bottom row:

Also in that image right above Ellison is Paul Singer, and what this reminds me of is Twitter in 2020-21 when Singer's Elliott Management had bought a significant minority interest in the company and Elliott's Jesse Cohn was placed on its board and had a very important role in running the company during that critical period regarding the election, covid lockdowns, Laptop Biden, Jan 6, impeachment, the vaxx rollout, and when Jack Dorsey was under fire.

I looked for a same-name agency in the US government and the closest I got was the US Digital Service, which is involved in these type of matters - same-ish but not same same.

Wtf. Greenwald has not presented any evidence of anything whatsoever. He has quoted from his own article on substack in 2022, from Reuters in that article, and from some TikToker’s video voicing his opinion unsupported by any evidence as well. I have no idea why I'm being subjected to this guy’s opinions by Greenwald. Other than that he seems kinda ghey…

But do you think this guy has a financial stake in TikTok’s operating in the US, as a prominent content creator? Like Greenwald does with Rumble? You don’t think that has any impact on what they’re saying?

Then Glenn tells us what we know, based on, one assumes, the Twitterfile reporting, the narrative of which I think is ultimately bullshit and have presented a lot of detail over this year to explain why. So I sure don’t know that.

His proposition is based on “the national security state”, the CIA, FBI, etc., controlling our government and country, but like so many others he is utterly reliant on a well-established alt paradigm that so many never question or even think about critically. And this is basically how he's been making his living for a decade, since Snowden.

Now remember, USDS is NOT the US government, it's a division of TikTok, which is rather apparent here but Greenwald claimed otherwise previously and hasn’t corrected that. And Facebook and Google are run by the Jews Zuckerberg and Page/Brin, just as a reminder. And isn’t the issue with TikTok more that it is allowing/pushing propaganda than it’s harvesting data on users? That’s what Greenwald said in his article last year.

Whatever, Glenn. So what we know is that all the US data is now in the hands of Oracle, which means the Jew Larry Ellison - jeez, I feel so much better. Is this all being done because of US government pressure, which means the FBI, CIA and DHS in Greenwald’s spooky narrative? I would guess in part. Is it also being done because Oracle bought a significant minority interest in the company in 2021? Definitely. Are those two things tied together? Absolutely - Ellison is a billionaire Jewish oligarch, Oracle is an important US company, and the government is responsive to things like that. What, you think Ellison gets pushed around by the FBI, et al, they say jump and he says how high?

But what about the CIA and FBI? Pure speculation, without any evidence provided whatsoever. So far - here Glenn moves on to the proof:

Proof?? Can I see into Joe Rogan’s mind? Thank God Glenn can and is here to explain it all to me. There I was thinking this is the way that Rogan lightly probes at things guests have to say that he either knows little about or thinks sound kind of dubious or unclear. But now I know that ol’ Joe has fallen for CIA propaganda, hook, line and sinker…

Because I would have thought that a foreign company trying to stay in the good graces in the US who hired Jewish management to deal with US relations and sold a nice chunk of itself to the Jew Ellison might have shut down the bin Laden letter chatter because of all the nasty things he had to say about Jews and their influence in the US and over US foreign policy for the benefit of Israel.

And now thanks to Glenn we all know how wrong that would have been… 🤭

And thank God that we’ve had TikTok, the last platform left where we can openly and honestly communicate with each other on deep, complicated socio-politics issues - but now it's under the complete control of the national security state as well! 😱😭

Oh, that’s right, I’ve never used TikTok…

So why would a Chinese company want to ban a video criticizing Zelensky and this war? But isn’t the real question why would a Jewish-managed/influenced company in the US want to ban a video criticizing the Jew Zelensky and this neocon proxywar? 🤔 Gosh, I just don’t know…

This is not journalism, it's not even close. What this is from what I can see is a Jew who at this critical moment is perhaps desperately trying to steer America’s so-serious Jewish problem away from the Jews and toward a pre-baked villain that people won’t question. Censorship of opposition to US support of the criminal state of Israel isn’t being done by Jews inside the new media giants, in cooperation with Jews inside the US government, all under powerful billionaire Jewish oligarchs, it's being done by the so-despised CIA! Trust me, because I have journalistic credibility and am a free-speech absolutist! 🙄

Do you think Ellison is going to just stand by and watch the US government, for no good reason, ban TikTok from the US? After Oracle bought a 12% stake in the company, and now is generating significant business from that? And what about the other US companies that bought into it back then? But more importantly, do you really think the government would actually do that? I sure don’t.

Here are the top donor organizations in the 2022 election, from OpenSecrets, and you can see Oracle was the 12th-largest:

You can also see that only 5% of that $33.6M went to Dems, so maybe that plays a role in any heat coming down on TikTok from the Dem side. Oracle was not in the top 50 donors in 2020, so maybe Larry doesn’t care for the Donald either. He’s not on Trump’s top donor list.

In any case, if one dismisses the narrative of Chinese government manipulations behind TikTok, which I think is very reasonable to do, that doesn’t mean one can immediately leap to CIA/FBI manipulations intended for censorship purposes, especially when one presents no hard evidence whatsoever. Greenwald is willing to talk about Oracle as an underling ally of the government in this manipulation, but not as an independent player in the censorship. Why not?

We can see another brief moment of Greenwald avoidance in his segment on the monumental Musk “FUCK OFF!!” moment. But first here as background, something he said earlier this week before that moment, after Elon’s Bibi-sucking triplette to Israel:

On that first bit, congressmen Schiff, Raskin and Goldman are all Jews of course; CNN here refers to Dana Bash, who is also Jewish. Then we see the ADL, the US media, US corporations including Disney, and the Israeli government all piling on Musk to censor. Hey, where's the CIA and FBI? I thought they were running the show.

But this is all about antisemitism, which is the worst thing one can be accused of. By far. As Glenn likes to say, do you see how this works?

He says Musk has two reasons to knuckle under, but only gives us one, human communal instinct - “if the Tribe expelled us…” I call bullshit on that; if he doesn't cite the combination of Jewish power and vindictiveness he’s outright lying.

Btw, Larry Ellison’s net worth is nearly $150B, which is more than Page and Brin (separately) and Steve Ballmer. But as a Jew his shekels are real F-you money.

So let's move on to The Moment, which inspired Glenn to pink-tie:

Well, maybe Elon does have F-you money after all! 🖕👍

So who is Musk telling to fuck off? As Greenwald says, “Bob” is Disney CEO Bob Iger; from his wiki: Robert Allen Iger was born to a Jewish family in New York City.

So Elon is talking to the Jewish pro-censorship blackmailer Iger, that's who. Jeez, we’re right back to where we were on TikTok - but Glenn says nothing. Of course Andrew Sorkin is also a Jew from NYC; he’s the guy who created the show Billions, which is all about Wall St. Jews but is cleansed of almost every ethnic indicator (but does have an extra-gender lead character), and he also wrote the book Too Big to Fail, which surely is ethnically-cleansed as well. But Glenn says nothing.

Well, he did call him an “establishment servant”, which is unlikely to be his true relationship to today's establishment. Now Biden, there's your ultimate establishment servant…

Then Glenn takes his shot at the mainstream media, but once again without the big blue elephant in that room either.

What is absolutely hyper-clear at this point is how this entire matter of censorship is utterly drowning in Jews. But that's not really the story Greenwald is telling, although in at least the Musk case he is providing actual raw information. TikTok, not so much, that's entirely bullshit.

So let's circle back to one of the authors of the false paradigm of the censorship-industrial complex, the Twitterfiler Matt Taibbi. Appropriate since I think it's the one-year anniversary of the first ‘filer tweets, yes?

Apparently the comedy team of Taibbi and Shellenberger testified in front of the Jordan committee again this week, which I haven't looked into yet. Here's Matt as part of his other comedy team, starting with a little intro and then later getting to the meat of the matter in my view:

So Matt has a new favorite political villain, the Levi legacy entitlement Jew Daniel Sachs Goldman from New York. Goldman does deserve that, because he's so obvious in his role as a Jewish operative in elected government who is hoped will go on to become a senator and maybe even president some day. Getting there by riding the big blue wave, because he really doesn’t have any other qualifications beyond that.

But then they get up to 30k feet and try to define what's really going on here, and that shows they either don’t really have a clue or are working hard to find a replacement for what down deep they know is going on. For Walter it's an increasingly clear case of partisan politics (which is definitely the case with the Jordan committee), and Matt tries to shove this into a class framework, which really doesn’t work at all.

But what I think he’s talking about, once again, is this:

Walter's partisan theorem ends up focused on the Clintonite centrist Dems, of course, but why that is cannot quite be determined. Then he goes to the uniparty, but again he doesn’t seem to know why. He knows Trump isn’t part of this game, something about not having connections at Stanford (again getting us back to Renee DiResta), etc.

But the key party difference is the result of 2016. when the GOP unwillingly nominated Trump and the GOP neocons abandoned the party to support Killary. That knocked the ethno-balance completely out of whack, which perhaps had already been listing toward the Dems since 1992 and the Clinton Sellout. To be sure, there were still right-wing Jews whose main political issue (beyond neoliberalism anyway) was Israel who stayed the course with Trump, but that’s a minority and particularly among the visible activist Jews. There are a lot of center-right Jews who simply won’t support a Trumpian GOP.

This cluelessness on what drives it all is the inevitable consequence of journalistic failure on the Twitterfilers’ part. I mean, how do you winnow out all the other possibilities and come to the “national security state” conclusion if you fundamentally don’t understand what's going on, how this functions in a holistic sense, and what the actual motivations and goals are?

Me, I just don't think it's that complicated to understand, if one has an open mind…

Next up likely will be the latest Matt & Mike censorship revelations - I haven’t watched their testimony yet and have just started into their piece posted this week. But a couple early paragraphs caught my attention:

Emails from CISA’s NGO and social media partners show that CISA created the Election Integrity Partnership (EIP) in 2020, which involved the Stanford Internet Observatory (SIO) and other US government contractors. EIP and its successor, the Virality Project (VP), urged Twitter, Facebook and other platforms to censor social media posts by ordinary citizens and elected officials alike.

Despite the overwhelming evidence of government-sponsored censorship, it had yet to be determined where the idea for such mass censorship came from. In 2018, an SIO official and former CIA fellow, Renee DiResta, generated national headlines before and after testifying to the US Senate about Russian government interference in the 2016 election.

Ol’ Renee always grabs my ‘nads, and there’s new information right here. But first, I’m still not convinced that CISA created EIP, the evidence I’ve seen is very thin. Second, DiResta wasn’t an SIO official in 2018 as she didn’t go to Stanford until 2019; in 2018 she was at New Knowledge. But third, the “fellow” thing means to me she was on a CIA fellowship in college at Stony Brook, which if true is something I didn’t know, and that adds color to her thesis on propaganda used in the 2004 Russian election - which I would love to get my hands on...