The BJA and Racism's White Paintjob

Does the "culture war stuff" seen through the eyes of three NDoS women of color from the Black-Jewish Alliance milieu reveal a cult?

In my last piece I unfortunately stepped in the media equivalent of Springfield doggie protein poop by including some video from Sam Seder’s Majority Report operation straight outta Brooklyn. That and watching things like TYT and KKK videos has triggered my YouTube video feed, even though I can’t actually identify myself to that west coast Jewish operation by signing into an account, which I’m no longer allowed to have in this lifetime because I treated their community with disrespect. Apparently. And so now I’m endlessly being shoveled “independent” media that is community-acceptable on YT, including more from Brooklyn Sammy.

One of those was a takedown of exiled Shapiroite America-Firster blossoming antisemite Candace Owens from a couple months ago, where her kindergarten-level understanding of Jewish socio-political activism, that perhaps resulting from her Catholic conversion, had triggered a humor assault from Samuel & Co. Easy to do, given the cringiness of Candy-O’s recitation of Russian history.

Now, I’m not sure if she’s actually read Solzhenitsyn, meaning to me 200 Years Together, which in fact is very much not “readily available”; a case can be made that it’s the most-banned book in the English-speaking world, I suppose. She certainly could be referring to his Nobel Prize-celebrating Gulag Archipelago, which does touch on Yagoda, but that unlikely provides the full context.

I can forgive her for missing the date of the assassination of Alexander II by a year (it was 1881), and that it was anarchists and not communists who did that, but missing the date of the Russian Revolution by seven years and putting it four years before WWI? Yagoda was a rising career Chekist from the revolution until 1934 when he became the head of the NKVD and played a major role in the Great Purges until they swallowed him as well; he was put to death in 1938. He in fact played a major role in the final removal from life of Kamenev and Zinoviev, two of the most prominent Jewish old Bolsheviks who had formed along with Stalin the troika which took down Trotsky in the ‘20s.

So this is all a lot more complicated than the erroneous and simplistic story Candy told to Jimmy the Dupe, as is the implication that those millions were killed simply because they were Christians; it would be more accurate to say they died because they were seen as cattle, meaning gentile meat on the hoof fit for consumption. That opens the door for Sam & Co:

Sam doesn’t have to say that much, because his minions (minyan?) rush fill the open space with things like (European) colonialism and Nazism, but what he does say is accurate - the matter of Jews and Bolshevism is very complicated. He’s also right about many if not the majority of ordinary Jews not being Bolsheviks or even sympathizers, which also gets us back to Solzhenitsyn and to the civil war in Ukraine, the epicenter of antisemitism after the revolution - although Sam may also be talking about the purges, both the Great and the final ones focused on Jews during Stalin’s last years in 1948-53.

Here Sam basically says it’s Bibi-like stupid to conflate Jews and the Jewish state, even though it’s an ethnostate for Jews and almost certainly north of 95% of Jews in the world support it (although not unconditionally). Then he spins this to the good Jews in the US who oppose specifically what the Bibi-led Likudnik government is doing, but he doesn’t mention things like the recent poll I cited in my last piece, that 75% of them feel “emotionally attached to Israel” - which pretty much means by definition they think a Jewish ethnostate is justified, and that brings into question what they actually do think should be done with the perpetually-inconvenient Palestinians. For American Jews probably something about a two-state solution, at least for public consumption.

I should point out that conditioning aid to Israel doesn’t actually mean much at all unless one states the conditions, and that a Jew might consider what’s going on in Gaza a genocide does not mean they are opposed to it. I am sure there are many Jews, particularly in Israel, who are very much pro-genocide when it comes to Palestinians. Let’s not pretend otherwise.

After Vigeland leaves hints that perhaps she herself could use a lesson or two on the one-sided historical version of the Spanish Inquisition, we see the mass confusion on the Dore Show, and Jimmy’s sidekick goes to Rhodes, Quigley, and eventually Antony Sutton on Wall St. and the Nazis/Bolsheviks, right-wing conspiracy theory 101 straight from the John Birch Society propagandists. (Do you think this guy actually has read Tragedy and Hope, all 1300 pages or whatever?) I get the sense that Sam knows this too, but again his crew step in on him to squash the bug before it scurries away:

After they went full Nazi here Sam goes after Dore and his apparently-slow progressive-to-Trumptard slide that he says started right after the Sanders defeat in 2016, and I’ll spare you that bit. Here’s the end of this vid:

“Gives a shit” is like “I could care less”, Sam. So the highlights are that people on the left who voted for Trump over Killary did so because she’s a woman and not because she’s a bloodthirsty neoconish warmonger or an unfeeling economic neoliberal, that Jimmy the progressive wasn’t sufficiently loyal to Bernie the Jew because he was a closet Pocahontas supporter, that the first concentration camps were run by American white supremacists to brutally imprison indians, and that the South Africa camps also imprisoned blacks. (Of course all of that is entirely dependent on the definition of “concentration camp”, which surely has changed/broadened over time.) We cannot be allowed to forget about race and gender oppression for even one second.

The stew that comes out of this segment isn’t just a right/left dispute thing in some generic sense, rather it’s drenched in identity, victim group suppression, white supremacy and it's ultimate expression of Nazism, the elevation of Jews as the greatest among equals, and likewise the same for Bernie the Jew among progressives. Since they’re really shooting fish in a barrel by building this on the sand of a Candy-O appearance on Dore, the only thing that matters here is what Sam & Co. say, this isn’t some kind of debate between viable alternatives. These people are just stupid and ignorant, so what you should think is what we tell you to think.

So here we saw the bad black woman, although in the end they really attacked Dore’s operation more than Owens, perhaps in part because those are white guys and so deserve everything they get. Now let’s flip to a good black woman in a friendly interview by Emma Vigeland last week, without all the cutting humor (meaning Sam), to see more clearly what are the politics operating here; I have no idea who she is, but her name (and identity) is AM Brown:

The evolution there goes from racism, which of course just means white racism or white supremacy (the use of “supremacy” makes it easier to define as a white-only characteristic and also to extend it back more than 500 years to the age of exploration), to Zionism as some foreign contaminant to Judaism, which is otherwise a good and beautiful thing. Along the way there are signposts like “thinking about repair from harm”, which is a clear reflection of tikkun olam, the Talmud-sourced Jewish mission of repairing the world. But not a word about Jewish “racism” reflected in the long-standing treatment of Palestinians. Not yet anyway, because the defining isn’t yet done.

Note her description of the birth of whiteness - “when the whole idea of whiteness was being formed”. When was that exactly, and for what purpose or out of what forces? It’s unfortunate that she doesn't go into this at all, because that would say a lot about the viability of her thesis.

The key moment here is at the beginning when she says in any situation other than Israel there would be “clear-headedness” over what is going on, but she doesn’t say why that is. Which of course is because the perps are Jews, we all know that’s the reason, it’s not some great mystery.

Then immediately after that she says the power dynamics in the Gaza and Ukraine situations are the same, which they are. But she gets that backward anyway, pointing out that we, the US, are on the side of the victim in Ukraine and on the side of the victimizer in Palestein. In fact all you have to do is to look at the troika of Netanyahu, Zelensky and Blinken to see that power dynamic - three declared Jews, the characteristic which causes that foggy-headedness regarding Israel as well as the backward view of Ukraine.

You can extend both conflicts back 75 years to the births of Israel and the cold war, or more specifically 25 years to the failure of Camp David II under Clinton and his initial decision to move NATO eastward. Eventually that long-standing pressure seriously broke in both conflicts, in the case of Ukraine with Putin’s “special military operation”, and in the case of Gaza with Operation Al-Aqsa Flood.

But she doesn’t see that because she sees Ukraine as the victim and not a proxywarrior aggressor, that in turn because of the lack of clear-headedness resulting from the presence of Jews in that power dynamic.

Having shown us that she can’t see straight, she goes right back to white racism, as the model for unpacking and undoing Jewish Zionism. I have no idea if that connection is ethno-nationalism, in part because she didn’t explain her birth of whiteness to answer the question of that concept being linked to contemporary white nationalism, or in her terms white supremacy. My guess is not, because she clearly believes that white racism as the primary force in the 21st century world is much broader and runs much deeper.

Her accent mark on that comes at the end when she frames America as a land that was stolen (from the indians), just as she belongs to a people who were stolen (from Africa) at the same time. What is to blame for both of those things? Whiteness, one assumes.

Vigeland steers this discussion back to what matters:

Here we have clarity on the matter: whiteness is the real problem, and whiteness has contaminated even Jewish Zionist thought, presumably turning a beautiful impulse of returning to one’s homeland roots in a multi-colored communal way into land theft and exploitation and mass murder, the way that white people see and treat the world.

In the course of this we see her thoughts on the evolution of whiteness, like a cancer spreading, first enveloping Europe and then beyond. One of the hints of the flaws in this is her citing of Italians in a very US-centric manner: Italy, the base of the Roman Empire, the center of Christianity and the birthplace of the Renaissance, was never “non-white” in Europe, but in America, colonized and first populated by northwestern Protestant Europeans, Catholic Italian immigrants flooding into the country in the late 19th century were looked down upon. None of those people thought of themselves as white; their identity was based on nationality, language, religion, culture - ethnicity and not race.

As eMike likes to say, no one was white until the entry of blacks into the picture made a difference apparent, and so in those days basically whites existed in the south but not in the north, until the Great Migration. What existed in the north were new and different ethnic groups of Europeans and the “nativists”.

Her racialized analysis is also flawed in representing racial differences within Palestein, as Jews are a people of the blood and their closest genetic relatives are the Palestinians. The largest group of Israeli Jews are the Mizrahi, who never left the greater middle east after the diaspora - she is conflating culture with race. And she says here Jews are a multi-racial people, because there are some small number of black Jews due to historical race mixing in Africa, and because she has defined basically the Ashkenazi as white. Which makes them different from Palestinians who she has defined as brown people. Even though they’re all Caucasians and are so very closely related.

Brown even uses the Nazi-era term “Aryan” to condemn whiteness, which has the effect of defining whiteness as far right. Emma fans these flames by throwing in “trope”, the Hebrew term for truth 😉, and sexual violence, a crime surely unique to white men, being foisted upon innocent brown people. Brown then frames 10/7 in a manner that she doesn’t but absolutely should frame the Russian invasion of Ukraine - that also didn’t just come out of nowhere, woman.

There we see her instantly transition from what the Israeli Jews are doing to the Palestinians to what white America is doing to the world. There is no awareness that it’s Jewish America that is driving our alliance with the mass murderers, perhaps in part because she’s defined the Israeli power structure as white. They may be Caucasian, girlfriend, but they ain't white, that meaning Euro-Christian.

One last bit at the end, after the subject had changed… but at the same time didn’t:

Here we see the chasm between left and right today, which is, at least to me, increasingly now defined as normie vs conspiracy theorist. And so being a righty is defined as having a pathological problem, a mental health issue. You have to see the world through the lens of white racism and oppressed victim groups or there’s something wrong with you. Lefties are the well-adjusted coastal elite cosmopolitan people who have an innate ability to avoid the rabbit holes of any kind of alternative thinking or consideration of the possibility that the real world might be different from the one described on PBS. To think otherwise is literally insane. Right?

On the right this confidence in the world as defined by decree has severely eroded, in part because conservatism is always losing ground to progressivism, that is simply the nature of the human world, it’s always being changed. Part of the reaction to that is the creation of mythologies to explain that process, and on the right that includes the thread of conspiratorial thinking I’ve talked about a lot, that extending to and through the John Birch Society all the way back to Church and Crown resistance to the French Revolution and the enlightenment.

So when the world went mysterious 30 years ago the right was locked and loaded to see that and to try to explain that, if mostly rather poorly. And when it all came to a head in 2016, the right’s oppositional guy won while the left's guy, coming from the actual source of the hidden problem, did not. Maybe that was the cumulative wisdom of the electorate, who knows.

Swinging back to the ongoing battle of Springfield, we can see how this racism worldview, the product of 60 years of Cultural Marxism, plays out in a KKK discussion:

So in the end the immigration issue comes down to white-on-black racism. In this clip we see Krystal doing everything she can to paint an idealistic picture of Haitians saving this community, though that picture still makes no sense to me - a dying rust belt city with a bunch of factories that couldn’t find workers, so a city of 58k population includes 15-20k Haitians today, the only workers in a city in the middle of Ohio, a state of nearly 12M people with an official unemployment rate of 4.5% today, that these factories could find. That’s a quarter to a third of the population having moved in only in the last several years, one assumes involving the displacement of people now gone, since the city’s population hasn’t changed that much over this time.

Note that Krystal absolves the Haitians from any blame for the lack of unionization at these factories, even though it’s a basic understanding that new immigrant workers are generally counter to unionization advancement. The key to union power is a monopoly on labor, and immigrants constitute leakage in that system.

And there’s always the assertion that these people aren’t illegals, even though they’re (mostly) here under protected status, which is a temporary status granted to groups of people, basically refugees, who are determined to be unable to go home, people who are under or are headed for illegal status in the US. As its wiki says, “Temporary protected status does not provide a path to permanent resident status (green card) or United States citizenship.”

This defense of the Haitians on the Dem left pretty much defines what has happened to the left over the last 30 years, the fixation on racialized social justice warfare and the abandonment of concern for American working class people. While Shady Vance mostly does what pro-business Republicans have always done, just with a slightly different style. I mean, Bob Dole (Russell, Kansas) wouldn’t have talked openly about pet-eating immigrants.

Another Seder clip last week addressed the somewhat related matter of the Bernie-to-Donnie pipeline, specific to two people who are said to have made that trip, one by Kulinski which I question, and the other by me who he didn’t mention. The first here is Matt Taibbi, and Seder has been talking about the case of Me Too which snagged him around the time that he published a BLM book, and an unnamed player involved was clearly the ex-eXile Jew Mark Ames:

So here we have this mainstreamy Dem progressive leftist defining people who have shifted away from the DOA Bernie left to a greater or lesser extent as having done so as the result of some kind of professional trauma, perhaps involving both reputation/ego and derived income. Both Taibbi and Greenwald have identified their anti-Russiagate stance as what caused them to have been driven away from the left media ecosystem, and what Sammy said about Greenie and Maddow is explained by that. Greenwald also was no longer invited on Ashkenocracy Now over that, because Goodman the Jewess was pushing Russiagate, an ethno-operation, and there may have been others. Taibbi’s I Can’t Breath book came out in 2017, the same year as both started questioning the Russiagate mythology. Lesson: don’t fuck with a Jewish operation.

I don’t believe Seder’s explanation is a good one as is, it’s just way too simplistic and of course there isn’t even a whiff of anything legitimate about shifting alignment in the oppositional direction, even as a professional and not ideological move. As I’ve said, I don’t think Taibbi’s basic politics have really changed much, not meaningfully, and rather his gutlessness has had him bending his narratives in directions exploitable by the new GOP. Greenwald, I’m not even certain exactly what his politics were, but I do think he’s a creature whose “journalism” career has likely long been driven by a desire for fame and fortune, and where that leads him superficially matters little if at all. What seems to matter to him superficially is how the world sees him as having changed politically and not the other way around.

I do think both have had rather significant reactions to 10/7, though. For Taibbi it’s the sheer terror of having to talk about Jews that has led him to not address that matter almost at all, and for Greenwald it’s revealed him as the Jewish charlatan that he is and always has been down deep, playing both sides on a conflict that really has only one side unless you’re a Jew. It seems like they learned the lesson of 2017.

But again, what is missing in his framing is Bernie. This phenomenon isn’t just about shifting in a Trumpian or reactionary direction, it’s also about shifting away from something, and that something is the Bernie movement that started in the 2016 election. The spectacular crash and burn of progressivism five years after that rise of false hope plays a bigger role than where these people have ended up.

An example of this Bernie-wounded breed who didn’t end up on the oppositional right is Sabrina Salvati, and here are a couple cuts of two stories at the end of her pod late last week, on Shady’s anti-cat position on the menu at the Springfield diner and Mehdi Hasan’s dissection of Jill Stein over her selective inability to name required war criminals:

On that first clip, Sabby uses that contentious interview to condemn the Dem-leaning (Jewish) mainstream media as partisan, and she never even played or talked about the punchline, where Shady said he has to create stories to bring attention to matters of concern to him. In the second clip she doubles down on that MSM line with the shark Hasan, who simply cannot avoid reacting when he smells blood in the water (remember when he eviscerated Taibbi last year), and Stein was chumming like Roy Scheider in Jaws when she less than artfully refused to just condemn Putin as a war criminal.

On the latter, it’s stupid to debate whether or not someone’s a war criminal, because that requires an understanding of what technically is and isn’t a war crime, and it requires a conviction in a legal process - innocent until proven guilty. A process which almost certainly wouldn’t be legitimate, because war crime trials are almost always show trials and only certain people are subjected to them - we will never see Vlodo Zelenskyyy or Bibi Netanyahuuu in the dock in the Hague, for example. So a waste of time.

(Btw, Sabby claimed in that segment that the media lies about Stein and Putin sitting at the same table at the RT dinner in 2015, but you can easily find photos of them sitting together.)

But back to Sabby on the couch, even though she pretends to abhor both parties, she is so very clearly only going after the Dems, who she describes as a cult. Because they are normies who to her act like Stepford Wives, but she’s looking at them as an ex-Berniecrat post-progressive.

Which gets us to Seder’s trauma concept, the trigger for so many of these alt media types resorting to alignment with reactionary behaviors, all aimed at the Clintonite Dems. Her issue with the Dem cult is so clearly rooted in the Bernie movement, which she mentioned there, and that did have cultish characteristics, a cult of personality. Sabby likes to say that generic progressivism’s litmus test is Med4All, Bernie’s signature program, instead of even just saying universal, affordable healthcare. It’s Bernie who broke Sabby’s brain, the Berniecrat failure due largely to Brooklyn Bernie himself.

Likewise the Trump oppositional movement has a clear and pronounced cult of personality aspect - at this point it almost doesn’t seem to matter what his positions and stated policies are, if he really has any at all, rather he just represents pushback against a system that is broken and malfunctioning. This is what Fredo Cuomo said in a clip in one of my recent pieces here.

But the Dems, they are the leading promoters of normalcy in this world. Because they are the still-new establishment party, and they are more than anything else the leading instrument of Jewish power in America. This happened because they seized the center by adopting neoliberalism and neoconservatism from the GOP, and so gutted the left by winnowing it down to an acceptably narrow collection of evolved Cultural Marxist concepts - basically political correctness, social justice warfare and identity politics. The Jew then smiled because he was pleased, and showered them with shekels.

So we see the normies at MR, KKK and TYT (Emma used to work there) avoiding the broken brain syndrome of Berniecratic post-progressivism by sticking with the Dems and the new New Left’s self-definition based on race and gender. They have compromised themselves to remain normal in this new world order. Which is in a sense C-People like Sam’s world and goyische people like Kyle and Junk just live in it. And that leaves people like Salvati and Taibbi floating freely and dangerously without any mooring in this new world, while Greenwald busily constructs his own little self-defining empire within it.