Was the Jewish Question Openly Debated in Congress??

The raging antisemite RFK Jr appears before Jim Jordan's House Special Committee on Avoiding the Real Problem, and the real neo-Nazis reacted, in spades

Well, it just had to happen, I guess. Jim Jordan’s blatantly political and entirely worthwhile (in concept anyway) subcommittee on weaponization of the government invited RFK Jr to testify, and this right on the heels of his “antisemitic” statements on covid developed as a Sino-Judaic Alliance weapon of ethno-warfare. Well, that’s perhaps an overstatement - those slippery Finns may have been involved as well. 🙄

The consequences of the timing was obvious and inevitable. Enough so that Kennedy’s ten-minute opening statement was largely dedicated to that knee-jerk Semitic accusation - despite the Dem efforts to both cut that statement in half and later to hide it and everything else behind closed doors. Freedom of speech, baby! In fact don’t think for one minute they really wanted to VIP this show.

Since I’ve been focused on Kim Iversen and her promotion of the RFK candidacy a lot lately, I am including pieces of her video on this matter, starting with RFK in his opener talking about his personal experience with censorship:

So yeah, Youtube means Google, which means Page and Brin, and Instagram means Facebook, which means Zuckerberg. But Kennedy claims he’s getting censored by the Trump and Biden administrations, which of course is the full flowering of that seed-sewing critical moment of full-pucker decision-making by the Twitterfilers Taibbi, Shellenberger, et al to blame the government (principally the FBI and other intelligence agencies) for Big Tech New Media censorship. *Sigh*…

Continuing, starting with a typical specious claim by RFK on the factually-incontestable nature of his work (I guess I’m officially “nobody” now), and he quickly gets to his parallel claim about not being an anti-vaxxer, and then on to the heart of the matter:

Christ almighty - that was a shameful display, simply shameful.

Kim continues on Dem censorship attempts, featuring the utterly distasteful figure of Debbie Wasserman Schultz, and the vote on moving the hearing behind closed doors:

There we have Wasserman attempting another defamatory speech, and Daniel Sachs Goldman simply declaring “no to hate speech”, the two Jews on the panel (maybe - one never knows).

Of course Kim despises the Golden Waterwoman because she played a prominent role in StopTheSteal I in 2016 and now is doing everything she can to sink Kim’s latest promotional sensation, so is it pure self-interest as always? Me, I revile this piece of rotting flotsam that washed up on Miami Beach with her legacy NYC accent because she is purely an operative for the ruling deep state faction, something it’s hard to believe Kimmy can even quite contemplate, surely seeing only the evil Killary behind Debbie.

Then we get to ranking member Plaskett, who I addressed in my last piece on this long series of hearings when Taibbi and Shellenberger testified more than four months ago, saying she’s a black proxywarrior for the Jews groomed by the Jewish Rep. Jamie Raskin of Trump impeachment fame, the husband of Biden’s first nominee for Fed Chair last year. I think it’s worth starting with her opening statement:

She is of course correct, the core purpose of these hearings generally is GOP vs Dems political, and the RFK appearance is promotion of his run against the hated Biden. But she also has framed the core basis of the Dem attack on RFK, which is his antisemitism and racism more broadly, which is in turn based on his phenomenally stupid public statement about covid and Ashkenazi Jews. Meaning in a sense that he’s stumbled into a battle he cannot win.

Before we get back to Plaskett, there’s another opening statement I want to play part of, the one Dem witness who was also on the panel, Maya Wylie, another female black proxywarrior who frames this attack even more succinctly (and emotionally):

So there we have the black-Jewish alliance framed starkly in terms of the bread-and-butter of victimization, and led by the Kings of Victimization and the never-forget Tree of Life shooting. Of course she doesn’t say anything here about two of the primary causes for blacks having such a relatively high covid death rate: high rate of black obesity, second only to advanced age as a morbidity contributor to covid death, and “vaccine reluctance” significantly related to black conspiracy theorizing, including the Tuskegee thing that was later talked about. It’s better to leave that cause gap for the moment, which gets so easily filled in people’s minds by knee-jerk (white) racism.

A bit later in this statement:

First she’s justifying policing of speech as a counter to a genuine threat to American lives, which means hate speech and the censoring of that, however that gets defined. From an NGO standpoint, the two organizations which have been most responsible for the invention, promotion and policing of hate speech have been the ADL and the SPLC - do I need to say more?

Then she gets to “domestic terrorism” as the nation’s greatest threat, which is the domestic side of the terrorism paradigm established three decades ago during the ‘92-’95 run of Ruby Ridge/ Waco/OKC as the deep state’s grand fear-based ruling paradigm then superseding communism, focused on white nationalists or “neo-Nazis”, the purpose of which is self-explanatory in the same way that the international side focused on middle eastern Islamic Arabs is.

And then she moves to the “expertise” of the Stanford Internet Observatory, which means the expertise of one Renee DiResta, who I have covered ad nauseum here going back to last November before the Twitter Files even existed as a thing.

I think it’s time to clarify who Maya Wylie actually is, beyond being a black civil rights attorney who once worked for the ACLU, which we get from this hearing appearance - from her wiki:

Maya D. Wiley is an American lawyer, professor, and civil rights activist. She has served as president and CEO of the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights since May 2022. Wiley served as counsel to New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio… She was an MSNBC legal analyst from August 2018 to January 2021. Wiley ran in the 2021 New York City Democratic mayoral primary, placing third. Wiley is the senior vice president for social justice at The New School and a professor at the Milano School of Policy, Management, and Environment… Wiley was born on January 2, 1964, in Syracuse, New York, and raised in Washington, D.C. Her father was civil rights leader and academic George Wiley. Her mother, Wretha Frances (Whittle) Wiley, was white, and inspired her to focus on progressive issues…

Wiley earned a Bachelor of Arts degree in psychology from Dartmouth College in 1986 and a Juris Doctor from Columbia Law School… Wiley served in the Civil Division of the U.S. Attorney Office for the Southern District of New York. In 2013, Wiley was mentioned as a potential president of the NAACP, but the post went instead to Cornell William Brooks. Before being appointed counsel to Mayor Bill de Blasio in 2014, she worked for the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, the American Civil Liberties Union and the Open Society Institute…

Wiley is married to Harlan Mandel, CEO of the Media Development Investment Fund. They live in Brooklyn with their two daughters.

Oh sorry, that’s young canuck Howie Mandel with his jheri-curled Jew’fro, this is Harlan Mandel with the “little woman”:

They met at Columbia Law School, btw. Here’s a bit from an article I came across: “Maya Wiley is married to Harlan Mandel. Like his wife Maya, the MSNBC legal analyst, Harlan Mandel also held a senior-level position working for George Soros. Harlan Mandel is the former Deputy General Counsel of the Open Society Institute / Soros Foundations Network.” The article also quotes her saying her mother was an SDS member back in the heyday of New Leftism.

Anyway, I was only slightly surprised by the Soros / Open Society connection, and let’s remember that Georgie Porgie was/is the major funder of BLM’s rebirth of white-on-black racism. But I was not at all surprised that she had worked for the NAACP, I was betting on it; for more on the most-important organization in the history of the black-Jewish alliance, read my article here titled

So let’s watch some proxywarrior dancing here on black victimhood related to covid:

So here the Tuskegee affair is used to justify why blacks as victims of white racism were legitimately “vaccine-hesitant”, unlike whites and others who were science-deniers, and then speculation on why RFK the white guy may have used this as part of an effort to get people not to vaccinate. Genocide much?

Let’s hear her response to another friendly set-up question:

So she’s still playing the thoroughly-discredited Russia card. After that what she’s addressing regarding law enforcement isn’t the hated and murderously racist white police, it’s the Jew Merrick Garland’s Justice Department including the Twitterfiler-demonized FBI. Let’s get back to “hate” (and not of Catholics):

Me, I always thought kung flu was kinda funny. What this Dem is trying to firmly establish here with the aid of Wylie is that “hate speech” is equivalent to yelling “fire!” in a crowded theater with regard to the first amendment and exceptions to the right of free speech. Let’s continue:

Sorry if you got any of that piss spray on you at the end. But again we are talking about justifying a government role in censorship of speech, here based on the rules established by new media companies, which in themselves and in combination with their enforcement could be said to violate at least the spirit of Section 230, which intended to free them from the assumed liability of being publishers in the promotion of internet free speech for the people. Again, let’s just look at one set of those rules, from JouTube (Slavik spelling to honor our battling brothers in eastern Europe):

Wylie not only confirmed what the Dem rep was saying, she also said it was the government’s job to make sure they lived by these kinds of self-established rules. It’s not censorship, it’s not restraints on freedom of speech, it’s social responsibility on what is so clearly a life-or-death matter. Because the only speech that’s getting restrained is arising out of hateful bigotry and not any kind of reality, there’s nothing legitimate about it at all. Check.

Wylie gets back into this later under questioning by another Dem, and I will spare you that. But it’s clearly an intended theme here.

Back to Kim on Wylie:

She actually left out the worst parts of Wylie’s avoidance tactics at the beginning there, and Kim’s conclusion is really kind of naive and based on a lack of understanding. She thinks she’s dealing here with ethically-rotten Democrats who are trying to stop Covid Truth and RFK’s run for the nomination as a Truther, when the Soros & Co.-infected congressional Dems are actually taking advantage of an ill-timed RFK appearance arranged by the GOP side to achieve much larger and more important goals. But I’ll get to that in a minute.

So let’s get back to the Golden Waterwoman, first from Iversen:

So Kim tries to ease our pain, and of course she’s trying to establish what a c@nt DWS is while focusing on the covid science thing. But we need to hear the rest of this to get the full effect, the trimmed-off bits at the beginning and at the end:

Here we have DWS at the start citing acts of antisemitism stats, no doubt sourced from the ADL. If you want to get a better understanding of the paradigm of antisemitism, incidents and the dedicated work of the ADL, watch this 2009 documentary, Defamation, made by a young Israeli filmmaker, back when it was just a fraction of the problem it apparently is today:

And then she goes full-on Holocaustist, right down to blaming RFK for the “hate” inflicted on her children on, I assume, Facebook. Instead of blaming, oh, say… herself, the Jewess c@ntess mom who knee-jerk raises the specter of ethnic mass death whenever she want to impose her will on the goyim? I sure wouldn’t want to be one of her kids. But then again, I’m not Jewish, so who am I to judge?

I should give the Jew Daniel Sachs Goldman his time here as well, if only a couple minutes:

Okay, enough. So what is going on here? First, I have to assume this hearing was arranged with RFK and the others to discuss censorship (which Goldman suggested there at the end), or rather fight over politics framed around a discussion on government-imposed censorship, that in the setting of the recent court ruling that is now in suspension. See my piece on that ruling:

As part of that, Wylie was there to address that ruling from a “Democratic” point of view. But then RFK shit the bed with his stupid comment about the Finns and covid, and the whole playing field instantly changed. At that point the GOP side was kinda stuck serving up dinner for the Dems, allowing them on the surface to go after RFK the bigoted conspiracy theorist.

But the hidden grammar had changed as well, and it was an opportunity to justify censorship on new media based on hate speech, with antisemitism placed front and center, justified with no subtlety by the Jewess c@ntess DWS. It was a gift, like manna from heaven in Mosaic terms.

And this is exactly what all of this has been about, since day one many years ago when the first Holocaust denier got axed on usenet, My Face, Spacebook or wherever. Covid arrived in 2020 during an existential event, the election opportunity to finally get Donald Trump the f@ck out of the White House, and so it became so highly politicized. Controlling the covid narrative in the monopolistic-but-troublesome town square of Big Jew New Media became a means of imposing broad censorship, and way beyond covid and vaccines. And the 1/6-embittered more extreme covid anti-vaxxers just fed this monkey as well, making that censorship spear-tip so much easier.

And here the combination of RFK’s recorded brainfart blunder and Jordan’s unwillingness to cancel this RFK appearance created a glorious opportunity to the completely-Judified Dems, led by DWS and her loyal proxywarriors Plaskett and Wylie, and that was to make the case for open and advanced hate speech censorship not violating the first amendment, not by the letter of it and certainly not by the spirit of it. If successfully done, this would effectively cement minority rule in the United States. Because then you simply can’t criticize any minority victim group, as of course defined by the rules of cultural Marxism that we all have long been absorbing.

Another reason why we should be thankful that the Dem Jew-packing project on the SCOTUS that was started 30 years ago stalled out and was largely reversed by luck and Trump, because that IS the last line of defense. When this moves on from speech marginalization/censorship to speech criminalization we’re going to need all the help we can get.

Since Danny Sachs Goldman so briefly brought it up, I suppose we should take a moment to actually review the smoking gun moment itself, here as presented by the Jew-sucker Justice Democrat Kyle Kulinski doing play-by-play and color analysis:

I don’t think there’s any need to comment on Kyle’s problematic logic and rationalizing - the point was to show how idiotic the other guy looked to the average left-of-center voter - but I will image-comment on why Trump ended the Obama nuclear deal, which also explains why it hasn’t/won’t come back under Biden… or, one assumes, under Kennedy:

So we have RFK screwing up and then on his knees sucking as hard as he can and giving it all away, Jordan then serving up roasted RFK for dinner, and the Dems gleefully licking their chops on the high ground while prepping a Holocausted coup de grace on freedom of hate speech.

Geez, it almost seems like they’re all in it together…

But in clownworld it’s still all about fighting the good fight against those dastardly deadly vaccines. And in Trumptardistan it’s all about the prosecution of Hunter the Laptop to StopTheSteal III. And the various more-thoughtful Twittergaters still think it’s about government censorship imposed by those demonic intelligence agencies run covertly by Killary.

All of that was supposed to be featured in this hearing, and at least some of it did make an appearance. But instead that all became window dressing around the core matter of bigotry, racism and most importantly antisemitism.

Scoring the hearing overall: Cultural Marxism 6 (million), Freedom and Democracy in the USA 0.

And have we seen the topping out and turn on the RFK boomlet on the Dem side? Only time will tell…