A Crack in the Blue Steel Curtain - part 2
Nazigate continues to bear the fruit of understanding, on both sides of the Great Divide of power, as both bow down at the feet of the Dark Lord Holoc in their own doppelganging ways
On that Cultural Marxist score, there was a kind of interesting end to this interview, related to Cornel West and the black-Jewish alliance. This came out of a compliment by West on Norman’s latest book (on identity politics, which he seems to say tries to put a cover over class politics) that has created concerns in the view of some people, apparently. After a lot of fawning compliments Norm gets to the parting of the ways on “never forgive, never forget”:
So there we have the Jewish left savior Gnome being worshipped. And then the Holy of Holies bit - never forget, never forgive, retain the rage. And then the paywall cutoff…
I played this in part to transition into the last part of this piece, which is about an additional section of Naomi Klein’s Doppelganger, where she, to put it plainly, uses the US black paradigm significantly created by Jews in their role as the power structure behind civil rights to basically attack whites. In this vid I start with a couple brief bits from videos in my last piece on windows on Euro-Christian feeling by Jews, and then we’ll get to the same from Klein. The first half of this section of the book details a couple protests by Wolfie at commercial establishments which required evidence of vaccination for entry, at least as told by Klein rather silly, and one with clearly-intentional echoes of Rosa Parks on the bus.
She’s criticizing Wolf there, of course, but Wolf is essentially just a conglomeration of all her doppelganger influences, the Bannons and Carlsons and RFKs, the goy voices in bizarroworld whose spell she’s fallen under - that’s her function in this book, and her Jewishness ethnically cleanses Klein’s criticism too. Klein refers to herself as white repeatedly here - which she isn’t, she’s clearly a self-identified Jew - to lay the claim this is self-criticism for credibility purposes, and also as a typical crypsis play. And blacks are arguably just proxwarrior substitutes for Jews, the people who Euro-Christians have really wronged; this has essentially been their role going back to Leo Frank.
It's ironic that Klein strangely says neoliberalism distorted identity politics from its original good intentions into what it's become, when they both come from the same source with the same underlying intentions/consequences - different tactics in the same war.
Identity politics is part of the evolution of party politics and the left-right political philosophies underlying that, the shift of the Dems to being the party of oppressed minority people of color and oppressed gender groups, and the GOP to being the party of whites and particularly white men. That allows someone like Klein to overlay an attack on whites as a Jew with a cover of an attack on the right from the left. And it's not just that, because she adds frosting to the cake by making it an attack on bizarro mirrorworld from the sane real world. That she uses a loon fellow Jewess as the face on that is the cherry on top.
It's also ironic that Klein raises a paradigm of the US economy being built on the back of black slave labor at this moment. In fact it was the southern agrarian economy that was built on that and not the northern industrial economy which dominated after the Civil War, and after WWII and the great migration north many the offspring of those slaves were working for high union wages in the factories of the pre-rusted Midwest.
And that southern agrarian economy with its forced labor was very much like the Polish land-based economy on the black earth and its forced labor under second serfdom at that same time, which JP Himka details in a clip I included in my piece on Brzezinski in March and also in one of the videos I did last year in my Himka series.
In that Himka describes the ethnic components of that system - the Ukrainian serfs, the Polish landed aristocracy and the Jewish middlemen overseers. It's kind of hard to separate that from mid-20th century Ukrainian nationalist nazis warring against Jews and Poles as described by these Jewish self-righteous condemners. Especially when you consider this historical shadow that persists on American whites from the legacy of slavery and settler colonialism that Klein describes.
Where is the shadow on Jews for their role in these past wrongs? Will there be a shadow on them in the future for their current wrongdoing? Why is this black intellectual and what he said entirely missing from Klein’s story of slavery?
Martin goes on to detail the involvement of the Jew Aaron Lopez of Newport, RI. But as we all know, any criticism of Jews is antisemitic, and antisemites are only a half step away from being nazis, so this black intellectual gets erased, including in Klein’s book. Around and around we go. Or maybe all Jews are just subsumed into white people in this story, and there’s no point in discussing a subset of white racists involved in slavery, right?
Klein doesn’t provide any solutions here to the problem of our racist criminal majority of course, but there is a suggestion when she references “Tallahassee” Coates, the father of black slavery reparations - ie, the neoliberal solution. White people must take their hard-earned money and just hand it to black people, because their forebears were slaves - never mind if the whites’ forebears weren’t slavers, or even in the country back then (like mine). And many of those white people’s forebears were serfs at the time the black forebears were slaves (both ended around the same time), but that counts for nothing - pay up, mothafuckas.
Will that really solve the problem, the government so infected by identity politics seizing money through taxation and ceding it to “survivors”? Will the white mind living in shadow suddenly burst out into the sunshine of a new day? Will black people embrace the idea that all debts are settled and abandon their sense of victimhood, particularly the kosher version they have been operating under since 1914?
Or would we instead eventually see a “based on real events” Hollywood film, no doubt scripted by Josh Singer, that celebrates another Jewish victory over the hated Euro-Christians utilizing a proxywarrior victim group, like Spotlight?
She builds on this general theme in the next several sections ending this chapter, on Canadian indian children genocide (where she suggests reparations in land transfers, that minimally impacting “cosmopolitans” of course), the trucker mandates protest (you know, honk honk equals heil Hitler), before she gets to the next chapter - The Nazi in the Mirror. Yep, no subtlety there, and that brings us full circle to the Canadian parliament and this 98-year-old threat to world Jewry.
So let’s look at that. Again we’ll see the Jewess utilizing a black proxywarrior in her tale, in this case the Haitian filmmaker Raoul Peck and his HBO series Exterminate All the Brutes (I haven’t seen it) based on the 1992 book of the same title by the Swedish writer Sven Lindqvist.
Before I get into this, a bit from Peck’s wiki:
Raoul Peck would go abroad a lot. He said that when he goes abroad he can find a sort of peace. It was hard being a black writer in America. In other parts of the world he was way more accepted. Being away from all of the racism helped him focus on his work.
Finding a writing partner (this task is difficult as is) with a biographical, philosophical, or a political profile that permits a common or complementary approach has always been a difficult process for Raoul Peck. Nonetheless, Peck found a match in screenwriter Pascal Bonitzer when writing The Young Karl Marx. He said, "The artistic challenge — and it took me ten years with Pascal to write this story — was the writing. That was the most difficult part. We were making a film about the evolution of an idea, which is impossible. To be able to have political discourse in a scene, and you can follow it, and it's not simplified, and it's historically true. This is the accomplishment."
Here’s a line from an article on the French film The Adventures of Rabbi Jacob I came across: “The pro-Palestinian Pascal Bonitzer, a self-identifying secular French Jew…”, so we have that settled. Before that we see here the uniquely crushing racism (white, I assume) in the US crippling Peck’s ability to even work. Perhaps it’s not that hard to see why Klein turns to Peck in her tale:
This is the same revisionist story I have addressed numerous times before, including in my piece last year on Ken Burns’ Holocaust in America film and the army of Jews and their proxywarriors behind him - the determined spreading of blame for the Holocaust far and wide to cover all Euro-Christians, but particularly Americans. The foundational crime there isn’t just antisemitism though or ignoring the crime of the century as it developed or turning away Jews looking for refuge, it’s eugenics.
Last year I did a series of videos on this eugenics paradigm, comparing the similar takes promoted by three very different people - the Catholic Jew-sucker RFK Jr from his Book, Ashkenocracy Now’s Amy Goodman with co-ethnic guest Adam Cohen, and the neo-Bircher JQ-denier anarchist James Corbett; here is the first part. That was before the Burns propadoc, which echoes the same dogma. The redefining of history.
From there she moves on to lebensraum and equates it to America’s westward expansion, another lesson learned by the Nazis from Americans. Then the end of that section and the beginning of the next:
She forgot to mention that it takes Euro-Christians too, but maybe that goes without saying. She also forgot to say hated groups means hated by whites.
“But seen from the perspective of the Caribbean it was all one long continuous snaking story” - I’m guessing she isn’t referring to Tony Martin there. She does cite the original black frontman for the Jewish NAACP though, DaBoys saying Hitler resides inside all white Christians - exactly the core claim of The Authoritarian Personality, which we’ll get to shortly.
In the first section she inaccurately separates the camps between goys for labor and Jews for chamber fodder. Later she says the Holocaust was massive, fast, higher tech and industrial in its scale, but that's not quite the actual story. Example: in the three Reinhard camps along today’s Polish eastern border the means of execution involved the exhaust of captured Soviet tank engines (almost certainly diesel, which is another problem) that were constantly breaking down, and then the burning of thousands of bodies stacked on railroad rails in open pits after digging them up to hide the evidence. That's totally amateurish, an almost clownish method of killing and disposing, and that's where the fate of the majority of Jews who are said to have died in the death camps was met. If these were factories of death, they were like factories along the fall line in New England powered by waterwheels in the 18th century.
There are a lot of problems in that second section. One is the definition of assimilation, which apparently is in the eye of the beholder. I’m sure that Klein would claim she’s fully assimilated, yet in this book alone there are mountains of evidence that she’s not, always seeing two worlds, the (good) Jewish one and the (bad) gentile one, and that massively impacts her objectivity - which is non-existent in this book.
Another example might be Aaron Mate, who we saw was working with/for the JAP Katie Halper, in addition to working for Max Blumenthal at Grayzone. Before that he worked for Paul Jay at Real News and Amy Goodman at Ashkenocracy now. Before that, according to his wiki: From 2003 to 2005 Maté worked as a primary researcher for Naomi Klein, who in 2010 praised him as "a great intellect and terrific journalist". These people are all Jews, and is that just random occurrence? Or are they just bigots who practice blatant favoritism? Are they effectively operatives working an ethnic project?
No, they're just fully-assimilated Jews. Right. Just like there was obviously no question at all on the level of assimilation among any of the interned Japanese, they were clearly just brutes intended for elimination. Today's brutes of course are the Zionist Jews, with false and antisemitic accusations of “dual loyalty” being the fabricated basis for more camp-filling. 🙄
She also talked about Jews in Germany during the Holocaust, but it was somewhat contrary to what Timothy Snyder has repeatedly said: Jews in Germany were better off than Jews elsewhere under German occupation. Only 3% of the claimed victims of the Holocaust were German Jews, and half the Jews still in Germany at the start of the war survived. German Jews were looked at differently than the shtetl trash living in their future lebensraum.
As an alternative to Klein’s story on the Holocaust and the purpose served by that in this book, let’s look at a couple other views. I’ll introduce those with the Jewish Marcuse family, Grandfather Herbert and grandson Harold:
The first part is from a Youtube video titled Demoralization: What Yuri Bezmenov Didn't Tell You, just recommended to me by a reader. The second part is Dean Irebodd’s Buchenwald film, and in my last piece I linked a video I did comparing the Billy Wilder propaganda film in that to the representation of that film in David Talbot’s The Devil’s Chessboard, here. You know, since Klein chose to bring up Buchenwald there in her book.
Here we get to the real matter, the US military psychwar operations that produced that propaganda film, continuing both videos from where I left off. The first video is addressing the Frankfurt School’s influence on the US military’s propaganda and psychwar operations after they arrived in the US during the war:
Then the second video addresses those operations on the ground in Germany and at Buchenwald:
Irebodd goes on to address the role of classic deep state operative CD Jackson at Buchenwald, waving the supposed human pelvis ashtray at the crowd of German civilians, and his propagandist employment later in the Eisenhower administration and at Henry Luce’s Time-Life, including the purchase and vaulting away of the Zapruder film in 1963. What he doesn’t say, if I recall correctly, is that Jackson was Jewish (his real last name was Jacobson) - there is a book on the history of the Dakota apartment building in Manhattan that talks about Jackson living there and the matter of his Jewishness.
The number one usually hears or reads is that 70% of the psychwar staff working in Germany at the end of the war were Jewish. If you look at the names you see there in Sykewar and the Hackett book, most of them appear to be Jewish.
Connecting this all to the matter at hand in the Klein book, here we complete the evolution to that in the first video:
So is Klein “mirroring” a proud tradition among her people of tribal psychological warfare against hated enemies? I think she is.
The book’s next chapter, The Unshakable Ethnic Double, is increasingly infuriating (but for me not in the way Klein intends it to be, it does not make me hate myself), and I will fight the urge to get into that - I’ll keep my powder dry for her concluding parts which lie ahead.
But I do want to include one small bit from this scree, when she touches on someone I never heard of before, the one death among the radical Jewish leftists of the first half of the 20th century that she finds most regrettable - Abraham Leon:
The “Jewish capitalism” bit was another annoyance, as this all came after she had repeated the old line that Jew haters contradict themselves when they talks about Jewish communists and Jewish bankers, as if it’s not possible to have both matters as issues simultaneously in our world - and sometimes working in unison; think Jacob Schiff and Russia in 1905 and 1917.
When I think of Jewish capitalism I think of neoliberalism, or more specifically Chicago School and Austrian School free-market capitalist economics. If one looks at the important figures who pushed that and nearly a half century of neoliberalism through the lens of POSIWID - the purpose of a system is what it does - it justifies that characterization. It has been a critical component of the rise of Jewish power over that time, because under this system money is power.
She also mentions the International Jew, and it’s worth citing Churchill on that from his 1920 article Zionism versus Bolshevism: A struggle for the soul of the Jewish people.
International Jews
In violent opposition to all this sphere of Jewish effort rise the schemes of the International Jews. The adherents of this sinister confederacy are mostly men reared up among the unhappy populations of countries where Jews are persecuted on account of their race. Most, if not all, of them have forsaken the faith of their forefathers, and divorced from their minds all spiritual hopes of the next world. This movement among the Jews is not new. From the days of Spartacus-Weishaupt to those of Karl Marx, and down to Trotsky (Russia), Bela Kun (Hungary), Rosa Luxembourg (Germany), and Emma Goldman (United States), this world-wide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilisation and for the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence, and impossible equality, has been steadily growing. It played, as a modern writer, Mrs. Webster, has so ably shown, a definitely recognisable part in the tragedy of the French Revolution. It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the Nineteenth Century; and now at last this band of extraordinary personalities from the underworld of the great cities of Europe and America have gripped the Russian people by the hair of their heads and have become practically the undisputed masters of that enormous empire.
I include this in part because generations of Birchers have been told Churchill was describing the Illuminati there. The other categories of Jews he described there were national Jews (the good ones) and terrorist Jews:
There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creation of Bolshevism and in the actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution by these international and for the most part atheistical Jews. It is certainly a very great one; it probably outweighs all others. With the notable exception of Lenin, the majority of the leading figures are Jews. Moreover, the principal inspiration and driving power comes from the Jewish leaders. Thus Tchitcherin, a pure Russian, is eclipsed by his nominal subordinate Litvinoff, and the influence of Russians like Bukharin or Lunacharski cannot be compared with the power of Trotsky, or of Zinovieff, the Dictator of the Red Citadel (Petrograd), or of Krassin or Radek – all Jews. In the Soviet institutions the predominance of Jews is even more astonishing. And the prominent, if not indeed the principal, part in the system of terrorism applied by the Extraordinary Commissions for Combating Counter-Revolution has been taken by Jews, and in some notable cases by Jewesses. The same evil prominence was obtained by Jews in the brief period of terror during which Bela Kun ruled in Hungary. The same phenomenon has been presented in Germany (especially in Bavaria), so far as this madness has been allowed to prey upon the temporary prostration of the German people. Although in all these countries there are many non-Jews every whit as bad as the worst of the Jewish revolutionaries, the part played by the latter in proportion to their numbers in the population is astonishing.
But I was interested in this guy Leon, and so the first thing I looked at was his death at Auschwitz. That is confirmed in his wiki:
He was taken to prison and tortured by the Gestapo; yet even under these conditions Leon was able to smuggle letters from prison and establish a tenuous link with his Belgian party comrades. The Nazis wasted no time in deporting Leon to Auschwitz where he was brutalized until he became sick and was then selected by the SS to be sent to the gas chamber. He was thus murdered by the Nazis in September 1944 at the age of 26.
That struck me as amazingly specific for someone killed in the gas chambers, since my understanding is that there are very few if any specific records of individual deaths by chamber. But there was a footnote, so I went to that, and it’s a webpage of someone named Ernest Mandel. It turns out that he was one of three notable Trotskyite covert activists in Belgium during the war: Leon, Mandel and Martin Monath, all Jews with Polish roots (Leon from Warsaw, Mandel born in Frankfurt, Monath from Galicia, the same oblast as the Canadian nazi) and all very young.
The source is a long piece about Leon, and here’s the bit on his death:
Leon was the type least able to withstand the regime of Nazi concentration camps. He possessed a sense of human dignity which found intolerable contact with the degradation and cruelty which became the common denominator of human conduct inside the concentration camps. The nobility of his character was shattered against the implacable bestiality of egos in despair, just as his body became broken by physical exertions to which it was not accustomed and by malignant disease. After several weeks of labor in a road building gang, he was sent to a quarantine camp. There one had to devise tricks, grovel before the masters, engage in petty trading and steal in order to survive. He could not rise above his companions in misery along these lines. Chained to his miserable cot, he passed his last days in reading and meditation. He was certain that the end was near. There came the final “medical inspection.” The sick destined for the gas chambers were selected. He was among them.
I’m sorry, but as a source that sounds pretty fictionally dramatic - I’m surprised there’s nothing about him hiding silver coins up his ass and using them to pay off the guards. Mandel clearly admired Leon deeply, and the whole piece is an honoring of the guy. And the mythologizing - this sounds more like a guy who perhaps committed suicide in his miserable circumstances, but the chambering works better on multiple levels.
I was able to find his tract on the Jewish Question, though, and am starting to read it. I did immediately go to a section on eastern Europe up to the 19th century, because of what I have heard JP Himka and E. Michael Jones say about the Jews in Poland (and because Leon was from Poland):
This is part of what Leon had to say:
But it is certainly not by chance that at the same time that the Jewish question was being extinguished in the West, it rebounded with redoubled violence in Eastern Europe. In the period when the Jews in Western Europe were being massacred and burned, a large number of Jews had sought refuge in the countries where capitalism had still not penetrated. At the beginning of the nineteenth century, the immense majority of Jews inhabited the east of Europe, principally the former territory of the monarchist republic of Poland. In this paradise of a carefree Shlachta (petty nobility), the Jewish commercial class had found a large field of activity. For long centuries, the Jew was a merchant, usurer, publican, steward to the noble, an agent for everything. The small Jewish cities, submerged in a sea of peasant villages, often themselves adjoining the chateaux of the Polish feudal lords, represented exchange economy within a purely feudal society. The Jews were situated, as Marx states, in the pores of Polish society. This situation lasted as long as the social and political organization of Poland remained static. In the eighteenth century, following upon political confusion and economic decay, Polish feudalism found itself fatally stricken. Along with it the secular position of the Jews in Eastern Europe was shaken to its foundations. The Jewish problem, close to vanishing in the West, flared up violently in Eastern Europe. The flame, close to extinction in the West, received renewed vitality from the conflagration which arose in the East. The destruction of the economic position of the Jews in Eastern Europe will have as a consequence a massive emigration of Jews into the world. And everywhere, although in different forms and under different guises, the flood of Jewish immigrants coming from Eastern Europe will revitalize the Jewish problem. It is in this respect that the history of the Jews of Eastern Europe has certainly been the decisive factor in the Jewish question in our epoch.
The commercial relations of the Jews of Eastern Europe, of Bohemia, Poland, and Little Russia, date from the Carolingian era. The trading circuit that the Jews had established during the early Middle Ages between Asia and Europe became extended in this way across the fields of Poland and the plains of the Ukraine. Like their coreligionists, the Radamites, the Eastern Jews exchanged the precious products of Asia, spices and silks, for the raw materials of Europe. They constituted the sole commercial element in a purely agricultural society.
So it’s kind of the same story, but without the serfs, without the vodka and without the partitioning of Poland and the creation of the Pale. But there is something on the Jews and slavery:
In a document of 1090, the Jews of Prague are depicted as traders and money changers, possessing large sums of silver and gold; they are depicted as the richest merchants among all peoples. Jewish slave merchants, as well as other Jewish traders coming from the Far East and traversing the frontier in caravans, are also mentioned in documents of 1124 and 1226. The interest rate among the Jewish bankers of Prague, whose operations were very extensive, fluctuated between 108 and 180 percent. The chronicler Gallus states that in 1085, Judith, the wife of Prince Ladislag Herman of Poland, strove to buy back some Christian slaves from Jewish merchants.
And as you can see there he’s got the usury, and from there he goes into that in detail, the rise of powerful bankers who gained significant landholdings:
Just as in Western Europe, development of trade went together with an expansion of usury. Here also, the nobility, principal client of the Jewish usurers, strove to obtain restrictions on Jewish usury as against the kings who favored it “for the Jews, in their capacity as slaves of the treasury must always have money ready for our service.” In the sejm of 1347, the nobility, desiring to limit the interest rate which had reached 108 percent, collided with the firm resistance of royalty… Under such auspices, the affairs of Jews could not help but prosper. In the thirteenth, fourteenth, and fifteenth centuries, Jewish usurers succeeded in taking possession of a portion of the lands belonging to the nobles…
The most important “bankers” lived in Kraków, residence of the kings. Their principal debtors were in effect the kings, the princes, the voyevode (governors), and the archbishops. Thus Casimir the Great borrowed the enormous sum of 15,000 marks from Jewish bankers. King Louis of Hungary owed the usurer Levko of Kraków 30,000 gulden at one time, 3,000 gulden at another. King Vladislav Jagiello and the queen, Jadwiga, also owed him substantial sums.
Levko was not only a great banker; he was also a wholesale farmer for the kingdom. He leased the mint and coined its money; and the salt mines of Wieliczka and of Bochnia were also farmed out to him. He owned houses at Kraków, as well as a brewery… The usury of the great Jewish bankers such as Miesko, Jordan of Posen, and Aron, who succeeded in amassing immense properties and took possession of villages and lands, raised a storm of protest among the nobility.
Here we see an example of the rise of conflict between the Jews and what I guess you could say was the petit bourgeois:
The backward state of the country also fettered the evolution which we have observed in the countries of Western Europe: the eviction of Jews from commerce and their confinement within usury. The bourgeois class and the cities were only beginning to develop. The struggle of the bourgeoisie against the Jews remained in an embryonic state and did not achieve any decisive results. The artisans, oppressed by Jewish usury, joined ranks with the traders. Here also, the sooner a province developed, the sooner arose conflicts with the Jews. In 1403, at Kraków, and in 1445 at Bochnia, artisans incite massacres of Jews. But the struggles were only episodic and nowhere ended with the elimination of the Jewish element. On the contrary, in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, their situation is only strengthened and Jewish commerce continues to flourish. In the second half of the fourteenth century, we hear of a “syndicate” of three Lemberg Jews, Schlomo, Czewja, and Jacob, formed with a view to furnishing Italian merchandise to the city council of Lemberg.
I included that last part because Lemberg is Lviv in Galicia, or Lvov under Polish rule, although this was still long before the partitioning of Poland and Lvov into Austria. Later on another hint of how the Jews saw Poland regionally:
We have already spoken of the Vaad Arba Aratzoth which was the General Assembly of the Jewish councils of Poland (of four countries, Great Poland, Little Poland [Kraków], Podolia [Galicia-Lemberg], and Volhynia), which met at regular intervals and constituted a veritable parliament.
Krakow and Lemberg were the twin foci of Galicia, and we also have Volhynia here, as well as an area in west-central Poland today around Poznan. Again, this is the history that underlies and impacts Ukraine today.
Then we finally get to the story told by Himka and Jones there:
In the seventeenth century the foundations of Jewish autonomy began to rock. This coincided with the worsening of the situation of Polish Judaism as it began to feel the disagreeable effects of the anarchy that Polish feudal society was passing through. The partial change in the situation of the Jews, arising from the lessening of royal authority, had as result the placing of the Jews in greater contact than previously with the great mass of the bonded population. The Jew, becoming the steward of the noble or a publican, was hated by the peasants equally with or even more than the lords, because he was the one who became the principal instrument for their exploitation. This situation soon led to terrible social explosions, above all in the Ukraine, where the authority of the Polish nobility was weaker than in Poland. The existence of vast steppes permitted the formation of Cossack military colonies where fleeing peasants could prepare their hour of vengeance.
“The Jewish steward strove to draw as much as possible from the manors and to exploit the peasant as much as possible. The Little Russian peasant bore a deep hatred for the Polish landed proprietor, in his double role as foreigner and noble. But he hated even more, perhaps, the Jewish steward with whom he was in continuous contact and in whom he saw at one and the same time the detestable representative of the lord and a ‘non-Christian’ who was foreign to him both by his religion and his way of life.”
The tremendous Cossack revolt of Chmielnicki in 1648 results in completely erasing seven hundred Jewish communities from the face of the earth. At the same time the revolt demonstrates the extreme feebleness of the anarchic Polish kingdom and prepares its dismemberment. From 1648 on, Poland never ceases to be the prey to invasions and domestic troubles. With the end of the old feudal state of things in Poland the privileged position of Judaism is likewise finished. Massacres decimate it; the anarchy which rules the country makes any normal economic activity impossible.
Now, this seems kind of odd to me, an anti-capitalist Marxist most concerned with class struggle over anything else, who after focusing on the aristocracy and Jewish merchants finally gets to the masses of peasant serfs here, but both glosses over it and also clearly favors the Jewish merchant class in the tone of the narrative, victims caught in the middle. And there’s not much explaining of the Cossacks as significantly manned by runaway serfs, that this was a proletariat revolution of a sort.
Then Klein further ethnically cleanses this brave history that she apparently values by not really addressing it at all, rather just includes Leon as a Trotskyite who had the intellectual courage to address the Jewish Question and then got holocausted into oblivion. Then it's on to “Stalinism”, the critical flipping point of Jewish leftists from political Marxism in the first half of the century to cultural Marxism in the second half. If a singular revolutionary revolution won’t happen, then try a multifaceted evolutionary revolution. And so let’s get back to crapping on whitey.
I don’t think I need to summarize and conclude this, I think it’s all pretty clear for anyone who will see it and consider it; those who have become fully infected over the last 60-70 years probably won’t, and they won’t exactly because of their psy-op training - think negatively in any way of the Jews and the next thing you know you’re constructing concentration camps and gas chambers. So positive thoughts only.
But I surely will get to my concluding thoughts on this book once I finish it - thankfully there’s not that much left…
Postscript:
The addressing of the Jewish Question today, after Holocaustism conquered public speech, is essentially prohibited. Here is how the ADL defines the JQ:
The "Jewish question" is an idea that began circulating in the 1800s. Some European writers, philosophers and theologians claimed that Jewish presence in society was a problem that needed to be solved. The Holocaust was the result of the Nazi party's effort to achieve what it referred to as the "final solution to the Jewish question." Modern antisemites use the phrase and it's abbreviation "JQ" to state their antisemitic bonafides and to indicate they're aware of the problem as it persists today, according to them.
But we have seen here a Jewish writer addressing the JQ, and of course Karl Marx also did the same, in his essay On the Jewish Question (how much did Leon source from that?). Here I will add another to Leon and Churchill above, a piece of The Jewish Question in Europe: The Causes, The Effects, The Remedies, a series of articles published in La Civilta Cattolica, a publication of the Catholic Church, in 1890. This part notably addresses Austria, which is as close to Poland as it gets a century after the partitioning. These are sections in part two, the effects:
II. Usury, Weapon for Subjugation
Sebastian Nicotra quotes a passage from an old manuscript, only lately discovered, in which a Jew describes the key of Jewish power in our day. He said to his brothers:
"My sons, Jehovah is with us in his mercy and has reserved to us a powerful weapon, or better said, an invincible virtue, which we ought to launch into the midst of the nations of Christ in order to subject them to our domination. This virtue is named in the holy book, and it is called usury. The holy book, you know it, prohibits usury among brothers, against the tribe, against ourselves; but it doesn’t prohibit using it against the foreigner, against the infidel, against the enemy, since it is a weapon of war and an instrument of victory. Usury then remains to us, and better than the faith and morals of Christ, usury is the little stone that fell from the mountain, which must cover the world; the mustard seed that grows into a superb tree, which will dominate the world." (19)
(19) Socialismo, ["Socialism"] page. 339-40.
Nine years ago a great rabbi, speaking in Paris to his faithful, said:
"Using the pretext of aiding the masses of workers, we can overtake the world by taxing the majority of landowners, and when their property (through usury) shall be transferred to our power, the labor of the Christian proletariat will fall to our advantage. Poverty enslaved, said the poet. The proletariat are the lowest servants of the speculators (usurers), but oppression and outrage humbly serve the cunning. Who can deny the cunning, prudence and the perspicacity of the Israelites?" (20)
(20) V. La Contemporain, ["The Contemporary"] July 1, 1881
This flower of Talmudic doctrine has permeated the spirit of contemporary Judaism, mindful of the Bible’s words, Pecuniae obedium omnia(All things obey money). On the freedom to practice usury, Michelet wrote:
"The Jews have resolved the problem of volatizing money; they were granted the freedom to lend, and they are now freemen, owners; from transaction to transaction, they have ascended to the throne of the world."
In March, the Editor of Pall Mall Gazette in London, sent one of his correspondents to Berlin, to interview the preachers of the Stoecker faction, one of whom is the very zealous leader of the anti-Semitic league of Germany. Pastor Stoecker was quoted as saying:
"I do not hate the Jews, nor do I wish them evil through religious hatred, but as I serve God, as a Lutheran pastor, and as a representative of the nation, I cannot remain quiet, having heard and seen the infinite evil that the Jews have done and still do in my country and especially in Berlin. Here the Jew has all of the gold in his hands, and consequently he also holds in his hands all of the power. I do not detest the Hebrews because they are rich, but because they accumulate wealth dishonestly. In the countryside, they cheat the businessmen, and in the city, they make money by dirty means. I maintain what I have said earlier: that from the viewpoints of trade, of social interests, of politics and morality, the Jews are leading Germany to the precipice."
Financial Domination
The situation in Germany has reached such a point, that in September Mr. Ahlward was able to publish in Berlin his book, titled, The Desperate Struggle between the Aryan People and Judaism, which, because of its fearful evidence, the Government believed it was necessary to suppress it.
The same month, the German parliament echoed the Austrians’ warnings against the rampant financial domination of Judaism.
The Jews were bandits ten times over in their domination of the House of Austria; and took firm hold under Ferdinand I, brother of the Emperor Carlo Quinto. In Austria, they were permitted entry; and they remained there as servants of the Holy Emperor, up to the time of Tersa who favored them, and permitted them to go into various provinces. In the German countries, there was an interdict on their entry, except in Vienna; they were permitted entry in the reign of Wenceslas, on the condition that they did not exceed a fixed number of families. They were more tolerated in the reign of Stefan, remaining there because of other countries’ laws forbidding them to immigrate. However, the greatest amount of liberty was accorded them in Trieste. From the ghettos of the Duchy of Mantova, from the Republic of Venice, from the Papal States, and from the Levant, they were able to come into Trieste, because of which today they feign a fondness for Trieste, professing a kind of hyper-patriotism, that is actually uproarious. They have also gone into Poland, where the Jews of Gallicia and other Polish regions gained the same privileges. Finally, from 1848 to 1869, all of the defensive restrictions of the Empire were repealed, and the Jews were free to enter, and to insinuate themselves there. This has been done, and is being done at present.
During the discussion in the Viennese Reichsrath, regarding the Jewish question, the valiant orator, Lueger, said, amid the approval of the majority of deputies:
"Is the universal domination of the Hebrews a fairy tale? Look at France, look at Hungary. In the latter country, the basest Hebrew has more power than the Cardinal Primate. And who, in Austria, in terms of evidence of the predominance of the Jews, can deny that they own the ironmaking industry of the North, and the oil concerns, and the coal; and that everything cedes to their advantage? And is it not a serious argument in favor of their predominance, that the president of the Reichsrath intends to ask our colleague, Pattaï, not to speak here of Rothschild, for fear that he might cut down our public funding?"
III. Property Extortion
Something else has occurred that also vivifies the Austro-Hungarian example, so corrupted by Judaism, and worse than a vine fallen prey to caterpillars. It is now opportune to explain.
The progeny of Abraham, in ten years, has increased by 2.07 per cent: from 1,154,000 which its children were in 1869, now to 1,648,708. The legal limit on the possession of property was extorted by the Hebrews after 1848 in Hungary, and after 1862 in the rest of the Empire. In such a brief interval, the Rothschild family, in Bohemia alone, acquired a quarter of the land, as well as possession of 60 of the oldest homes in the realm; and now they possess seven times more than the imperial family. Today, in the realm of Saint Stefan, the Jews have in their power so many nobles, that they enjoy more than a quarter of the electoral votes in the elections for the highest positions; and they have begun to pluck the titles and the names of the most illustrious lineages of that region. Half of the County of Neutra now belongs to a single Hebrew, Baron Poppel.
The Hungarian public debt, which in 1873 was $221 million, rose in 1885 to $1461 million, and now is more than $1600 million. And the Minister, Tisza, the great patron of the Jews, three years ago proposed giving a seat of honor in the court to Alberto Rothschild and his wife, in recognition of his merits in sponging off the national credit. To accord him this is to add to the mockery.
But the most desolate example is Gallicia. The Jews, in just a little more than twenty years, have assumed ownership of 80 percent of its territory, followed by gaining ever more power and holdings, and putting up for auction lands failing to pay taxes.
The arrogance of this race in the Hapsburg Empire has come to such, that not long ago a Jewish municipal lawyer from Vienna publicly responded to a Christian, who was complaining of the great amount of power being ceded to the Jews:—"If the Christians are unable to tolerate this state of affairs, the remedy is clear: leave the Empire, emigrate somewhere else more hospitable."
Many will take this advice, since 2 million foreign usurers have appropriated the patrimony of 40 million Austro-Hungarians, who have extended hospitality and civil equality to them. And throughout the Empire will be revived the cultivation of land by slaves, who make money for the new owners. The descendants of the old princes and magnates will dig the gardens and the fields of the emancipated rag dealers of Vienna, of Presburg, of Buda; and their children will wash the feet of Sara and Guiditte.
https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1712342306597065001/photo/1 important stuff happened in just that map...
https://jewishstudies.washington.edu/sephardic-studies/ladino-identity-and-restitution/